• Services
    • Catastrophic Personal Injury
    • Companies & Businesses
    • Commercial Property
    • Divorce & Family
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Personal Wealth
    • Property Development
    • Residential Property
  • Sectors
    • CleanTech
    • AgriTech
    • Charities
    • Education
    • Farms & Estates
    • Leisure
    • Medical, Dental & Veterinary
    • Public Sector
    • Renewable Energy
  • Our People
  • Join us
  • About
  • Contact
  • Services
    • Catastrophic Personal Injury
    • Companies & Businesses
    • Commercial Property
    • Divorce & Family
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Personal Wealth
    • Property Development
    • Residential Property
  • Sectors
    • CleanTech
    • AgriTech
    • Charities
    • Education
    • Farms & Estates
    • Leisure
    • Medical, Dental & Veterinary
    • Public Sector
    • Renewable Energy
  • Our People
  • Join us
  • About
  • Contact
01223 417200
Home Knowledge Base Property Development Ruling on Practical Completion of Construction Contracts

Ruling on Practical Completion of Construction Contracts

Practical Completion - Court of Appeal GuidanceThe Court of Appeal has handed down a decision in which, for the first time in 50 years, it considered the issue of ‘practical completion’ in construction contracts (Mears v Costplan*).

In this case, a prospective tenant, Mears, entered into an agreement for a lease for two blocks of student flats on completion of the build.  The agreement contained a clause stating that if a certificate of practical completion had not been issued on the blocks by 18 September 2018, Mears could give notice of termination.  The lease prohibited the reduction of room sizes by more than 3% from those shown on the contract drawings.

Breach of agreement
In August 2018, Mears complained that the room sizes of the buildings were more than 3% smaller than as shown in the contract drawings, in breach of the terms of the agreement. Despite Mears’ complaints, Costplan indicated that it intended to issue a certificate of practical completion.

Mears sued and obtained an interlocutory injunction restraining Costplan from issuing a certificate of practical completion until trial. In addition Mears sought declarations including that the reduction in size was a material breach of the agreement, which would prevent practical completion.

Breach of contract vs practical completion
At first instance, although the judge found that the rooms had been built 3% smaller but refused to grant Mears the declarations sought.  On appeal, the judge agreed with the decision at first instance.  The appeal court judge made a distinction between a breach of the contract (that the rooms were more than 3% smaller) and whether the building could be certified as practically complete. Whether or not a breach of contract would preclude practical completion was a matter of fact and degree in each case.  The judge stated that it would be commercially unworkable if every departure from contract drawings resulted in the prevention of practical completion regardless of the nature and extent of departure.

Elizabeth Deyong Property Partner Barr EllisonPrinciples of practical completion
The judge set out a number of pragmatic principles to help identify that a building has been practically completed, including when:

  • the building can be used as intended; and
  • all items of work have been completed and all defective work has been remedied (other than trifling defects).

It is important to note that the judge found that the fact that a defect is irremediable does not preclude practical completion.  The judgement contains a strong streak of pragmatism throughout, the judge noting that practical completion is easier to identify than to define.  For example, just because a build is capable of being inhabited does not necessarily mean that it is practically complete regardless of the nature and extent of remaining work.

This decision provides welcome assistance to developers in providing certainty that not every tiny departure from plans will be enough to preclude completion certification.  However, the decision will also provide relief to prospective tenants showing that defects of sufficient severity will preclude practical completion despite the fact that the building is technically habitable.

*Mears Limited v Costplan Services (South East) Limited & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 502.

For more information please contact Elizabeth Deyong (email: e.deyong@barrellison.co.uk) (telephone: 01223 417 267).

Disclaimer: While we do all that is possible in terms of ensuring its accuracy, this blog contains general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You need to consult a suitably qualified lawyer from the firm on any specific legal problem or matter.

Other Property Development Articles

Development Land: Preparing for Market Upturn

Development Land: Preparing for Market Upturn

For landowners with planning permission for development or the prospect of obtaining permission, Barr Ellison is offering a free overview of title documents and the provision of a Title Report to be included within the [...]

12 May 2020
Read full article
Removing or Modifying Rights Over Land

Removing or Modifying Rights Over Land

A stark reminder that any agreements relating to land ideally should be in writing and registered at the Land Registry immediately.

2 Jan 2020
Read full article
Long Leaseholders: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

Long Leaseholders: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

A restrictive covenant may be amended if it does not secure any practical benefit to the benefitting party. In this case, the financial effect of the restrictive covenant was the primary way in which benefit [...]

25 Nov 2019
Read full article
Ruling on Practical Completion of Construction Contracts

Ruling on Practical Completion of Construction Contracts

Court takes pragmatic approach in its first consideration of Practical Completion in construction contracts for 50 years.

25 Sep 2019
Read full article
Climate Change Mitigation has become a Planning Consideration

Climate Change Mitigation has become a Planning Consideration

The High Court has put climate change considerations firmly on the map by clearly stating that efforts to mitigate climate change, via optimal functioning of solar panels, are material considerations when it comes planning permission [...]

27 Aug 2019
Read full article
Sober Reading for Landowner Victims of Waste Dumping

Sober Reading for Landowner Victims of Waste Dumping

The background to this case provides sober reading for any landowners of vacant sites. In this instance, around 2000 tonnes of waste including food and medical waste was deposited on Newark’s vacant land without [...]

24 Jun 2019
Read full article
Mortgage Default: Who May Buy the Property?

Mortgage Default: Who May Buy the Property?

Anybody entrusted with selling property on the behalf of a lender can take comfort in the robust approach shown by the Court.

23 May 2019
Read full article
Successful Restrictive Covenant Modification in Cambridge

Successful Restrictive Covenant Modification in Cambridge

Barr Ellison acted in a successful application to modify a restrictive covenant for a developer which otherwise prevented their redevelopment of a site in Cambridge.

23 Apr 2019
Read full article
Strategies for Restrictive Covenants

Strategies for Restrictive Covenants

Restrictive covenants can be a headache for developers who have otherwise found the perfect piece of land on which to carry out their dream development.

16 Mar 2019
Read full article
A Tenant’s Right to Quiet Enjoyment – What a Developer Landlord Needs to Know

A Tenant’s Right to Quiet Enjoyment – What a Developer Landlord Needs to Know

It is always preferable for leases to contain express reservations to alter, build and erect scaffolding in favour of a landlord who might want to develop at some point in the future.

16 Mar 2019
Read full article
Strategic Breach of Restrictive Covenants by Developer

Strategic Breach of Restrictive Covenants by Developer

A Court of Appeal decision serves as a warning to developers of the dangers of proceeding with developments in breach of a restrictive covenant.

4 Mar 2019
Read full article
Ready, Set, Complete

Ready, Set, Complete

It is a strict requirement that a party needs to be in compliance with all conditions precedent before serving a notice to complete a property transaction.

20 Feb 2019
Read full article
Procedural Unfairness in Planning

Procedural Unfairness in Planning

Appellants would be well advised to take care when introducing new evidence to a planning appeal, ensuring that it is available in good time for public inspection, usually via the local authority’s website.

14 Feb 2019
Read full article
Contrived Redevelopment Scheme to Oppose New Tenancy

Contrived Redevelopment Scheme to Oppose New Tenancy

The Supreme Court held that the landlord’s intention to demolish or reconstruct must be independent of the tenant’s claim for a new tenancy and not conditional upon it.

31 Jan 2019
Read full article
Cambridge News Property Awards 29 November 2018

Cambridge News Property Awards 29 November 2018

Barr Ellison once again sponsored the Innovation of the Year category at this year’s Cambridge Property Awards.

30 Nov 2018
Read full article
Japanese Knotweed Nuisance

Japanese Knotweed Nuisance

A landmark case has clarified the scope of an action for nuisance based on the presence of Japanese knotweed.

29 Nov 2018
Read full article
Overage Disputes & Property Developers

Overage Disputes & Property Developers

Overage disputes: Court likely to strictly and literally interpret the provisions of an overage agreement between experienced developers.

23 Oct 2018
Read full article
Property Developers and Urban Explorers

Property Developers and Urban Explorers

In recent years, a subculture has developed that has caused property owners and property developers particular concern. Known as urban exploration or urbex ...

22 Aug 2018
Read full article
Developers: Building Contracts & Implied Terms

Developers: Building Contracts & Implied Terms

The Court of Appeal has found that a term to deal with planning permissions can be implied in a construction contract ...

23 Apr 2018
Read full article
Modifications to Restrictive Covenants – Welcome News for Developers

Modifications to Restrictive Covenants – Welcome News for Developers

Developers will welcome recent guidance on the modification of restrictive covenants …

26 Jan 2018
Read full article
Supreme Court: Planning Permission Reasoning Must be Given

Supreme Court: Planning Permission Reasoning Must be Given

Where planning permission is granted, reasons for the grant of such planning permission may be required to be given, even where there is no statutory duty to do so.

4 Jan 2018
Read full article
Lack of housing supply not a green light for planning

Lack of housing supply not a green light for planning

There is an emerging trend towards local authorities refusing planning even where they cannot demonstrate adequate housing supply ...

12 Oct 2017
Read full article
Property Developers and the EIA Scheme

Property Developers and the EIA Scheme

The Environmental Impact Assessment Directive updates the EU’s legislation on environmental impact assessments with a substantial refresh of the EIA Scheme.

3 Jul 2017
Read full article
Posted on 25 Sep 2019

Other Articles

  • Commercial Property
    • Landlord & Tenant
  • Community
  • Contested Wills Probate
  • Divorce & Family Breakdown
    • Alternatives to Court
    • Child Arrangements
    • Cohabitation Agreements
    • Collaborative Divorce
    • Divorce Finances
    • Nuptial Agreements
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Debt Recovery
    • Landlord & Tenant Disputes
    • Property & Boundary Disputes
  • Personal Injury
  • Property Development
  • Residential Conveyancing
  • Wills, Probate, Tax & Trusts
Legals
  • Cookies
  • Cyber Fraud
  • Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
  • GDPR
  • Gender Pay Report
  • Professional Status & Insurance
  • Terms of Service
  • Workforce Diversity Data
Where to find us
Parkside Office

39 Parkside
Parker's Piece
Cambridge
CB1 1PN

01223 417200

enquiry@barrellison.co.uk

Addenbrooke's Office

PO Box 196
The Concourse
Addenbrooke’s Hospital
Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ

01223 411315

enquiry@barrellison.co.uk

Copyright Barr Ellison LLP - all rights reserved