• Services
    • Catastrophic Personal Injury
    • Companies & Businesses
    • Commercial Property
    • Divorce & Family
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Personal Wealth
    • Property Development
    • Residential Property
  • Sectors
    • CleanTech
    • AgriTech
    • Charities
    • Education
    • Farms & Estates
    • Leisure
    • Medical, Dental & Veterinary
    • Public Sector
    • Renewable Energy
  • Our People
  • Join us
  • About
  • Contact
  • Services
    • Catastrophic Personal Injury
    • Companies & Businesses
    • Commercial Property
    • Divorce & Family
    • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Personal Wealth
    • Property Development
    • Residential Property
  • Sectors
    • CleanTech
    • AgriTech
    • Charities
    • Education
    • Farms & Estates
    • Leisure
    • Medical, Dental & Veterinary
    • Public Sector
    • Renewable Energy
  • Our People
  • Join us
  • About
  • Contact
01223 417200
Home Knowledge Base Divorce & Family Breakdown Prenuptial Agreements & Second Marriages: Once Bitten, Twice Shy

Prenuptial Agreements & Second Marriages: Once Bitten, Twice Shy

Prenuptial agreements come into play very strongly on second marriages. And yet, in my experience, too few people embarking on second marriages consider a prenuptial agreement.  Perhaps it is viewed as only for the wealthy or for people with assets abroad (where absent an agreement they would be held to a property sharing regime).  These are all ideal candidates, but prenuptial agreements also have a role for those embarking on second marriages who want to protect their assets in the event of another divorce.

How to increase the weight given to your prenup
Prenuptial agreements are not legally enforceable in English law, yet.  The Law Commission reported on this in 2014 and put forward a proposal to make them legally binding in most circumstances (more of which later) but as we stand, anyone entering into a prenuptial agreement is warned they are not legally binding.  However they are also warned that the courts are likely to give considerable weight to the terms of a prenuptial agreement and the weight given can be increased by following a few important steps.

The seismic change in the law came about in the case of Radmacker (formerly Granatino) v Granatino in 2010.  Here the Supreme Court upheld a prenuptial agreement the terms of which were quite harsh as to the provision to be made for the weaker party financially.  It was thought by some that the fact the losing party was the husband rather than the wife may have influenced the outcome, but the cases that have followed have not taken a sexist line as much as argued for the parties’ right to set their own terms.  To quote Lord Philips in Radmacker:

“the reason why the court should give weight to a nuptial agreement is that there should be respect for individual autonomy … This is particularly true where the parties’ agreement addresses existing circumstances and not merely the contingencies of an uncertain future.”

This, to my mind, lends itself well to the situation of those entering into a second marriage.  They can point to the assets they have brought from their previous marriage; and they can also identify the children (whether minor or adult) they may wish to protect by the agreement.

Can’t oust Court jurisdiction
Entering into a prenuptial agreement is therefore setting out the provision that both parties agree will be the way their assets (current and accumulated during the marriage) should be dealt with on divorce.  This needs to be set against the fact that parties cannot oust the jurisdiction of the court – that is usually taken to mean that you cannot tell a Judge he cannot make the order he thinks is fair, even if you both have agreed something different.  But the Radmacker decision has been a ‘game changer’ in this respect.  To quote another Judge, Charles J in the case of V v V  in 2012:

“The respect to be given to individual autonomy means that the fact of an agreement can alter what is a fair result and so found a different award to the one that would otherwise have been made.”

So, if the courts are to be prepared to let couples take these decisions into their own hands, they expect there to be some safeguards in place to avoid a weaker party being coerced or simply tricked.  The cases have said that each party must enter into the agreement freely and with sufficient advice to enable him or her to appreciate its implications.  Additionally each must intend the agreement to govern the financial consequences of the marriage coming to an end.

There have been qualifications on having sufficient advice to appreciate its implications.  You cannot escape from the terms of an agreement simply by showing some insignificant asset was not disclosed.  The larger the asset base the party was aware of, the less consequential a small non-disclosure will be.  It also seems to be difficult to avoid an agreement on the basis the legal advice was not detailed enough.  It may well be the case that, for those who have already been ‘through the system’ and have had a divorce, there could be an assumption from the judges that they would be more familiar with the rights or claims that they may be limiting or relinquishing.

Recommendations
Going back to the Law Commission report, it sets out in some detail the steps that they recommend would lead to a binding agreement – they call them ‘qualifying nuptial agreements’:

  • Should be at least 28 days before the marriage
  • Made by way of deed
  • Contain signed statements that both understand it will remove the court’s discretion to make financial provision orders (with an exception)
  • Both parties should receive disclosure of material information about the other’s financial situation
  • Both parties should obtain legal advice as to the terms and effect of the agreement under the law of England and Wales

Karen Anker Family Divorce LawyerPrenups can operate as a depressing factor
The exception referred to above is that the court can still impose their own view if the agreement leaves either party without provision for their financial needs.  However, even when the court is persuaded that it is not bound by the agreement because it does not provide for a party’s needs, the agreement can still be relevant as it can operate as a depressing factor – affecting (in other words bringing down) the provision the court makes from what it otherwise would have been.

So, for many cases, but particularly for those going into second marriages, prenuptial agreements can offer considerable protection when drawn up correctly.  However if you find yourself in the situation of marriage break up for the second time and you have not protected your assets in this way, all is not lost.  You may be able to argue there is an unmatched capital contribution from your side; the length of the second marriage will have an impact on how significant this is.

For more information please contact Karen Anker, Family Law & Divorce Solicitor 

Disclaimer: While we do all that is possible in terms of ensuring its accuracy, this blog contains general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You need to consult a suitably qualified lawyer from the firm on any specific legal problem or matter.

Arrange an Appointment

More Family Law Articles

How to sort out Children Arrangements on Relationship Breakdown

How to sort out Children Arrangements on Relationship Breakdown

The court takes the view that in most cases the best people to work out children arrangements upon relationship breakdown are their parents. 

4 Jan 2021
Read full article
New Divorce Law – No Fault Divorce is on its way

New Divorce Law – No Fault Divorce is on its way

No fault divorce is finally on its way for those planning to divorce in England and Wales. Learn about how it will work.

15 Dec 2020
Read full article
When cohabiting couples separate

When cohabiting couples separate

Here we address what can be done to avoid problems when cohabiting parties separate. Note that there have not been any recent major changes of the law in this area. Cohabitees continue to have limited [...]

19 Nov 2020
Read full article
Protecting Marital Assets on Divorce

Protecting Marital Assets on Divorce

Where there is a real risk that an asset of value is going to be disposed of or in some other way removed beyond the reach of one spouse, then an application can be made [...]

13 Oct 2020
Read full article
Why Nuptial Agreements Make Sense

Why Nuptial Agreements Make Sense

The courts are likely to give considerable weight to the terms of a nuptial agreement, and the weight applied can be influenced by following a few important steps. Nuptial agreements can offer considerable protection, when [...]

23 Sep 2020
Read full article
Property ownership for cohabitees – common myths

Property ownership for cohabitees – common myths

Disregard entirely the law relating to marital breakdown when it comes to cohabitation. The following are the principle misconceptions many people hold and need to be corrected …

7 Aug 2020
Read full article
Protecting Your Children’s Wealth

Protecting Your Children’s Wealth

Family Wealth Protection: how to protect wealth passed to adult children in the event of future relationship breakdown.

25 Jul 2020
Read full article
Divorce: What to Expect at Your Initial Legal Consultation

Divorce: What to Expect at Your Initial Legal Consultation

The initial consultation with our divorce lawyer will cover a. options for resolving your claims, b. financial disclosure, c. potential outcomes, d. arrangements for children.

27 Jun 2020
Read full article
How Collaborative Divorce Works

How Collaborative Divorce Works

Collaborative divorce is a process where you and your former partner commit to settling matters without going to court. This is a short guide to how it is intended to unfold.

29 May 2020
Read full article
Guide: How to Agree a Financial Settlement on Divorce

Guide: How to Agree a Financial Settlement on Divorce

A guide charting the steps in achieving a financial settlement on divorce.

24 Mar 2020
Read full article
Posted on 11 Jan 2017

Other Articles

  • Commercial Property
    • Landlord & Tenant
  • Community
  • Contested Wills Probate
  • Divorce & Family Breakdown
    • Alternatives to Court
    • Child Arrangements
    • Cohabitation Agreements
    • Collaborative Divorce
    • Divorce Finances
    • Nuptial Agreements
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
    • Debt Recovery
    • Landlord & Tenant Disputes
    • Property & Boundary Disputes
  • Personal Injury
  • Property Development
  • Residential Conveyancing
  • Wills, Probate, Tax & Trusts
Legals
  • Cookies
  • Cyber Fraud
  • Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
  • GDPR
  • Gender Pay Report
  • Professional Status & Insurance
  • Terms of Service
  • Workforce Diversity Data
Where to find us
Parkside Office

39 Parkside
Parker's Piece
Cambridge
CB1 1PN

01223 417200

enquiry@barrellison.co.uk

Addenbrooke's Office

PO Box 196
The Concourse
Addenbrooke’s Hospital
Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ

01223 411315

enquiry@barrellison.co.uk

Copyright Barr Ellison LLP - all rights reserved